论文部分内容阅读
去年8月28日,上海宝钢日报四版登了一篇署名“诗君”的文章,叙述作者前往武夷山旅游,途经江西上饶时的遭遇。文章对上饶火车站附近饭店的脏、乱、差和摊贩的斩客现象,提出了十分尖锐的批评。如何正确对待这来自异地报纸的批评?当时,有些人受不了文章中尖刻的用辞和某些不实的指责,主张组织撰写反驳文章;还有人甚至提出要与宝钢日报对簿公堂。但上饶地委、行署主要领导态度鲜明:上饶火车站附近发生的问题,性质是严重的,情节是恶劣的,严重损害了上饶的对外形象。地委领导明确要求地委机关报赣东北报全文刊登。 10月3日,赣东北报在一版显著位置,全文转载了“诗君”的文章,并根据地委领导的意见,配发了编者
Last August 28, Shanghai Baosteel Daily published a fourth edition of an article titled “Poetry Monarch”, describing the author’s travels to Wuyishan and the passing of Shangrao in Jiangxi Province. Article on the Shangrao railway station near the dirty, messy, poor and street vendors chop off phenomenon, put forward a very sharp criticism. How to correctly handle this criticism from the newspapers outside the country? At that time, some people could not stand the sharp rhetoric and some false accusations in the article. They advocated the organization of writing counter-argument articles. Others even proposed to file a court order with Baosteel Daily. However, the leaders of Shangrao prefectural and administrative departments have a clear-cut attitude: the problems that have taken place in the vicinity of Shangrao Railway Station are serious in nature and the plot is harsh, seriously damaging the external image of Shangrao. The leaders of the prefectural Party committee explicitly requested that the local authority report the full text of the northeast newspaper in Jiangxi. On the 3rd of October, the northeastern Jiangxi newspaper, in a prominent position, reprinted the full text of “Poetry Monarchs” and distributed the editors according to the opinions of the leaders of the prefectural committees