论文部分内容阅读
施耐庵疑案一直是困扰《水浒传》研究者的历史难题。嘉靖以来数百年间人们对施耐庵的研究可谓聚讼不休,诸说并存。鲁迅、郑振铎诸人在周亮工的影响下提出托名说与累积说,当代学者则进一步概括发展为施耐庵托名说和集体创作说,从而将《水浒传》作者研究引向了迷途。本文在全面爬梳文献的基础上,对施耐庵研究中的托名说和集体创作说演进脉络进行了勾勒,并对这两种学术假说的缺陷进行了分析。
Shi Naian suspect case has been plagued “Water Margin” researchers history problems. Hundreds of years since Jiajing people’s study of Shi Naimi can be described as endless litigation, all that co-exist. Lu Xun and Zheng Zhenduo, under the influence of Zhou Lianggong, put forward the proposition and accumulative theory that the contemporary scholars further summarized the development of Shi Naian Toru and the collective creation theory, thus leading the author of “Outlaws of the Marsh” to the lost. On the basis of a comprehensive review of the literature, this article sketches the evolution of the inscriptions on names and collective creation in Shi Naian’s research and analyzes the defects of these two academic hypotheses.