论文部分内容阅读
近年来,祁连山北麓陆相泥盆系的研究,取得了一定进展,积累了一些宝贵的生物地层资料。但在地层名词的使用,特别是在老君山群一名的存废问题,各方看法颇有分歧。这不仅涉及怎样对待中外都有一定影响的地层名词问题,也关系到地质工作者怎样正确对待地层命名工作的问题。本文拟从祁连山北麓老君山群一名的讨论出发,提出一些不成熟意见,以供参考。
In recent years, the research on the continental Devonian in the northern foot of the Qilian Mountains has made some progress, and accumulated some precious biological stratum data. However, the use of stratum nouns, especially in Laojunshan group, one of the question of the existence of waste, quite different views of all parties. This is not only about how to deal with the formation noun that has a certain influence both at home and abroad, but also how the geological worker correctly treats the formation naming work. Based on the discussion of Laojunshan Group in the northern foot of the Qilian Mountains, this article proposes some immature opinions for reference.