论文部分内容阅读
据《成都商报》载:在贵州省黄平县很多市民毫不知情的情况下,他们的手机铃声一夜间变成了同一首歌曲,原因是黄平县政府以红头文件形式下发各单位,要求全县副科级以上国家工作人员全都换成统一彩铃,甚至有人家里的电话也被更换为同样的铃声。把是否更换彩铃作为衡量是否热爱家乡的标准,在黄平县政府看来是理所当然的事情,其背后潜在的逻辑就是个体选择权必须服从集体的要求,否则就是对集体意志的违背和对集体利益的漠视。以红头文件的形式要求更换彩铃,从本质上说是公权利对公民私权利的挤压和侵犯,因为官员的私权利首先是公民的私权利:用是否热爱家乡作为标准,还说明了政府理性的虚妄——谁能说不更
According to “Chengdu Business Daily”: In Huangping County, Guizhou Province, many people without their knowledge, their cell phone ringtones overnight became the same song, because the Huangping county government issued a document in the form of red-headed unit requirements The county deputy section above the national staff are replaced by unified ring tones, and even some people’s home phone has also been replaced with the same ringtones. The underlying logic underlying the Huangping government seems to be whether or not to replace the CRBT as a measure of whether it loves the standard of hometown or not. The logic behind this is that the right of individual choice must be subject to the requirements of the collective. Otherwise, the violation of the collective will and the collective interests disregard. The requirement of changing the color ring back in the form of a red-headed document is essentially the squeezing and infringement of civil rights by civil rights because the private rights of officials are primarily the private rights of citizens: whether they love their hometown as a standard, they also show that government rationality False - Who can say no more