论文部分内容阅读
本文研究了中国被试对十项归因(心境、技巧、知识、机会、努力、帮助、能力、任务、偏好和运气)在五个维度(基源性、稳定性、控制性、预见性和普遍性)上相对位置的评定。并与钱德拉等人(Cbandler & Spies,1984),用美国被试所得的结果进行了比较。实验结果表明中国被试与美国被试评定的一致性达62%。此外,没有一项归因的评定是在维度的极端等极(1.0-2.0或6.0-7.0)。
This study examines the impact of Chinese participants on the five dimensions (basicity, stability, controllability, predictability and well-being) of ten attributions (mood, skill, knowledge, opportunity, effort, help, abilities, tasks, preferences, and luck) Universality) on the relative position of the assessment. And compared with the results obtained by the U.S. participants with Cbandler & Spies (1984). Experimental results show that the Chinese subjects and the United States assessed the conformity of 62%. In addition, none of the attributions are assessed at the extreme poles of the dimension (1.0-2.0 or 6.0-7.0).