论文部分内容阅读
今年《江苏高教》第5期刊登了叶林同志的《我国高教核心期刊的测定及分析》文章(简称“叶文”)引起了我们的兴趣,感到其内容的讨论有积极意义,体现在:其合理部分,能提高高等教育期刊的办刊质量;其中我们认为不科学部分,也将因不同意见的学术争鸣而提高评估核心期刊的水平。本文只对“叶文”中通过文摘法测定我国高等教育核心期刊的排序同作者商榷。一、《教育研究》被排位第七引起的思考在教育和高等教育研究者心目中,一般认为《教育研究》是我国教育类(其中也刊登高等
This year’s “Higher Education in Jiangsu” No. 5 published an article titled “Determination and Analysis of the Core Journals of Higher Education in China” published by Yeh Lin (“Ye Wen”) aroused our interest and felt that the discussion of its content is of positive significance: The reasonable part can improve the running quality of journals in higher education. Among them, we think the unscientific part will also raise the level of assessing core journals due to the academic contestation of different opinions. This article only discusses the author’s ranking of the core journals of higher education in China by abstract method in Ye Wen. First, the “education research” is ranked seventh thinking in education and higher education researchers in mind, generally considered “education research” is our education (which also published higher