论文部分内容阅读
为了研究中世纪商人法的真正形貌,文章主要采用历史研究方法和比较研究方法等,对商人法各种史料进行了考察,认为在中世纪时期,商人社会无法发展出一套具有普遍性、系统性的和完全自治的法律体系;国内外国际商法学者对中世纪商人法的认知存在着证据支持不足问题;构建新世纪的跨国商人法规则,并不需要借助并不存在的中世纪商人法乌托邦来证明其具有“历史正当性”。中世纪的商人法不可能成为现代国际商法的模范和依托;构建新的统一商法体系应该考量现今的国际贸易形式和国家法律制度现状,将工作的着眼点放置在对各国国家法的比较和协调上,商人社会所谓的自治性民间规则只能起到有限的辅助作用。
In order to study the true appearance of the medieval merchant law, the article mainly uses historical research methods and comparative research methods to examine various historical materials of the merchant law. It is believed that in the Middle Ages, the merchant society could not develop a set of universal and systematic And completely autonomous legal system; there is evidence-based support for the cognition of medieval merchant law by domestic and foreign international business law scholars; and the transnational business law rules in the new century do not need to be proved by the utopian medieval merchant law that does not exist It has “historical legitimacy ”. The medieval law of merchants can not become a model and support of modern international commercial law. To construct a new system of unified commercial law should consider the current status of international trade and national legal system, and focus its work on the comparison and coordination of national laws of various countries , So-called autonomy folk rules in business society can only play a limited supporting role.