论文部分内容阅读
美国的民事诉讼系采用典型的当事人主义模式。虽然部分美国律师坚持认为,美国的民事诉讼制度是一个值得他国借鉴的范本,我国学界也侧重强调当事人主义诉讼模式的优点,但事实上,在美国本土,要求对现行诉讼制度进行改革的呼声已达到前所未有的程度。美国前总统布什抱怨道:“美国正从一个自由的国度演变为诉讼的乐土。”美国前付总统奎尔在1991年美国律师协会年会上批评道:“令人惊讶的诉讼费用以及漫长的诉讼期限,已使美国的竞争能力受到内在机制的损害。”1984年,时任美首席大法官的沃伦·伯格(Warren Burger)在1984年美国律协会议上告诫道“对于一个诚实的公民而言,我们的制度太耗费财力,太令人痛苦,太具有危害性,同时也太缺乏效率。”
The civil litigation system in the United States adopts a typical advocacy model. Although some American lawyers insist that the civil procedure system in the United States is a model that should be borrowed from other countries, our academic circles also emphasize the advantages of the litigant-type litigation model. However, in fact, the call on the United States for the reform of the current system of litigation has been Reached an unprecedented level. Former U.S. President George W. Bush complained: “The United States is evolving from a free nation into lawsuit.” Former US President Pau Guell criticized the ABA Annual Meeting 1991: “The surprising cost of litigation and the lengthy The litigation deadline has harmed the competitiveness of the United States by the inherent mechanisms. ”Warren Burger, then the chief justice of the United States, in 1984, cautioned at the 1984 American Bar Association that“ for an honest Citizens, our system is too financially expensive, too painful, too harmful, and too inefficient at the same time. ”