论文部分内容阅读
目的对剖宫产术后再次足月妊娠的两种分娩方式进行比较及分析。方法 102例剖宫产术后足月妊娠孕妇为调查对象,分为剖宫产组(52例)和阴道分娩组(50例)。对两种不同分娩方式进行比较。结果阴道分娩组的产妇住院时间、产后出血量均明显低于剖宫产组(P<0.05),两种分娩方式对产妇的影响情况比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);剖宫产组和阴道分娩组对新生儿的影响比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论剖宫产后再次足月妊娠的妇女选择阴道分娩值得提倡,但是仍需综合考虑孕妇具体病情选择分娩方式。
Objective To compare and analyze the two modes of delivery after full-term pregnancy after cesarean section. Methods A total of 102 pregnant women of term pregnancy after cesarean section were divided into cesarean section group (52 cases) and vaginal delivery group (50 cases). Two different modes of delivery were compared. Results The length of maternal hospital stay and postpartum hemorrhage in the vaginal delivery group were significantly lower than those in the cesarean section group (P <0.05). The effects of the two modes of delivery on the mothers were statistically significant (P <0.05) Group and vaginal delivery group on the impact of newborns was no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusions Women with full-term pregnancy after cesarean section should be encouraged to choose vaginal delivery. However, it is still necessary to consider the specific mode of delivery for pregnant women.