论文部分内容阅读
作者比较了36例点片血管造影(CFA)与数字肺血管造影(DPA)对肺栓塞(PE)的显示。男20例,女16例,年龄21～87岁,均行选择性DPA和CFA。35例临床及肺扫描疑为PE,另1例肺气肿术前检查。每肺至少检查两个方位。为保证照片质量,采用同样的导管位置、方位、对比剂剂量和注射速率。所有病人经股静脉插入7.1 F辫尾导管,行单或双侧肺动脉选择性置管,每次注入非离子型对比剂40ml,速率20ml/s。所有患者获取右前和左前斜
The authors compared the presentation of pulmonary embolism (PE) with 36-point angiography (CFA) and digital pulmonary angiography (DPA). 20 males and 16 females, aged 21 to 87 years, both selective DPA and CFA. 35 cases of clinical and lung scan suspected PE, another case of emphysema preoperative examination. Check at least two positions per lung. To ensure photo quality, the same catheter position, orientation, contrast dose, and injection rate were used. All patients through the femoral vein inserted 7.1 F pigtail catheter, single or bilateral selective pulmonary artery catheter, each injection of non-ionic contrast agent 40ml, the rate of 20ml / s. All patients acquired right anterior and left anterior oblique