论文部分内容阅读
司法审判是维护社会正义的最后一道防线,攸关人民群众的切身利益,在不断影响民意的同时也为民意所监督。近年来,作为民意与法意交流的重要平台,舆论媒体经常过度解读或者不当放大司法审判中的个别案件,引发甚至激化了民意和法意的冲突,给人民法院独立司法带来了巨大压力。在当前复杂的网情社情下,如何能在准确认识和理解两者关系的基础上,实现民意的畅通表达,使媒体和公众的知情权、监督权得到保障,同时又能保证司法程序的独立性不受侵害?笔者认为,舆论监督畅通了民意表达,促进了司法公开,是法治建
Judicial adjudication is the last line of defense for maintaining social justice, which is of vital importance to the people and the masses and constantly monitors public opinions while constantly influencing public opinion. In recent years, as an important platform for the exchange of public opinion and French law, the media often over-interpret or improperly amplify individual cases in judicial trials, triggering or even intensifying the clashes between public opinions and French sentiments, putting tremendous pressure on the independent judiciary of the people’s court. Under the complicated social network situation, how to realize the smooth expression of public opinion on the basis of accurately understanding and understanding the relationship between the two, guaranteeing the media and the public’s right to know and supervise and at the same time guarantee the independence of the judicial process Sex is not infringement? I believe that public opinion supervision of public opinion, and promote the open of justice, is the rule of law to build