论文部分内容阅读
《商标法》和《专利解释二》规定的证明妨碍规则的构成要件和法律效果模糊不清且没有统一。通过成本收益分析可知,要求权利人尽力举证或初步举证,应解释为是为了判断侵权人掌握的证据是否对证明待证事实具有不可替代性。参考或根据权利人的主张和提供的证据判定赔偿数额,应解释为推定权利人主张的证据内容成立,同时结合权利人提供的其他证据,确定赔偿数额。与《民诉解释》第112条保持一致,可以获得最优的解释结果。
Proofs under the Trademark Law and Patent Interpretation 2 obstruct the constitutional elements and legal effects of the rules that are vague and unorganized. Through the analysis of cost and benefit, we can see that if the right holder is required to prove or prove, it should be interpreted as to determine whether the evidence held by the infringer is irreplaceable. Reference to determine the amount of compensation based on the claims of the obligee and the evidence provided should be interpreted as establishing the content of the evidence asserted by the obligee, and determining the amount of compensation in combination with other evidence provided by the obligee. In line with Article 112 of Civil Interpretation, the best interpretation can be obtained.