论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究在下呼吸道感染的临床治疗中两种抗生素方案治疗的药学分析情况。方法:选取2013年10月至2014年10月在我院进行治疗的下呼吸道感叹患者108例,将其随机分为治疗A组和治疗B组,A组和B组分别采用左氧氟沙星和阿奇霉素进行抗生素治疗,比较两组患者的临床治疗效果以及两组患者的药物费用。结果:结果显示左氧氟沙星治疗的临床治疗总有效率为92.6%,阿奇霉素治疗的临床治疗总有效率为77.8%,左氧氟沙星治疗的A组患者的临床治疗效果优于阿奇霉素治疗的B组,其差异显著具有统计学意义(P<0.05),同时左氧氟沙星的药物成本明显低于阿奇霉素,其差异显著具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在下呼吸道感染的临床治疗中,抗生素左氧氟沙星的临床治疗效果明显优于阿奇霉素,取得了更为理想的治疗效果,同时性价比更高,值得在临床上推广应用。
Objective: To investigate the pharmacological analysis of two antibiotic regimens in the clinical treatment of lower respiratory tract infection. Methods: A total of 108 patients with lower respiratory tract sighs who were treated in our hospital from October 2013 to October 2014 were randomly divided into treatment group A and treatment group B. A and B were treated with levofloxacin and azithromycin respectively for antibiotics Treatment, the two groups of patients were compared with the clinical treatment and the cost of the two groups of patients. Results: The total effective rate of clinical treatment of levofloxacin was 92.6%, the total effective rate of azithromycin treatment was 77.8%. The clinical efficacy of levofloxacin in group A was better than that of azithromycin in group B, the difference was significant Statistical significance (P <0.05), while the levofloxacin drug costs were significantly lower than azithromycin, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the clinical treatment of lower respiratory tract infection, the antibiotic levofloxacin clinical effect is superior to azithromycin, and achieved a more ideal therapeutic effect, at the same time more cost-effective, it is worth in the clinical application.