结肠镜检查期间患者自控镇痛的重要性:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究结果

来源 :世界核心医学期刊文摘(胃肠病学分册) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:shinboy_zsl
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Background-In France, general anesthesia is given to more than 90% of patients undergoing colonoscopy although in several countries sedation is limited to intolerant patients. This study was carried out to determine whether Patient-Controlled Sedation (PCS) could provide a lighter sedation than general anesthesia adapted to the patient’ s individual requirement. Methods-Patients aged from 18 to 80 scheduled for elective colonoscopy were prospectively randomized to receive either standard sedation (control group) or patient-controlled-sedation (PCS). In the control group, patients received a continuous infusion of propofol. Patients in the PCS group were connected to an infusion pump containing propofol and self-administered 20 mg boluses as often as they required. An anesthetist was present throughout the procedure. Patient satisfaction measured on a visual analog scale four hours after colonoscopy was the main outcome criterion. Results-From December 2002 to September 2003, 402 patients underwent elective colonoscopy, 173 of them were eligible and were asked to participate in the study. Seventy-two gave their informed consent and were prospectively randomized. The patients’ mean satisfaction scores were not statistically different between the two groups: 84.7 mm (PCS group) vs. 91.5mm(control group); P = 0.24. Mean doses of propofol (60 mg vs. 248 mg; P < 0.001), depth of sedation and time before discharge (1.75 hours vs. 4.45 hours) were significantly lower for patients in the PCS group; nine of them (25.7% ) did not use the pump and had total colonoscopy without sedation. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding total duration of colonoscopy (19.4 min (PCS) vs. 18 min (control)) difficulty and therapeutic procedures (biopsy or polypectomy). Two weeks after the procedure, 96.5% of patients in the PCS group were willing to repeat the examination under the same conditions vs. 72.5% of patients in the control group (P = 0.03). Conclusions-Our results demonstrate that need of sedation is widely overestimated in France. A subset of our patients is willing to consider colonoscopy without general anesthesia. For them, PCS with propofol is an effective and very well accepted form of sedation. Background-In France, general anesthesia is given to more than 90% of patients undergoing colonoscopy although in several countries sedation is limited to intolerant patients. This study was carried out to determine whether Patient-Controlled Sedation (PCS) could provide a lighter sedation than Methods-Patients aged from 18 to 80 scheduled for elective colonoscopy were prospectively randomized to receive either standard sedation (control group) or patient-controlled-sedation (PCS). In the control group, Patients received a continuous infusion of propofol. Patients in the PCS group were connected to an infusion pump containing propofol and self-administered 20 mg boluses as often as they required. four hours after colonoscopy was the main outcome criterion. Results-From December 2002 to September 2003, 402 patien ts underwent elective colonoscopy, 173 of them were eligible and were asked to participate in the study. Seventy-two gave their informed consent and were prospectively randomized. The patients’ mean satisfaction scores were not statistically different between the two groups: 84.7 mm (PCS P <0.24. Mean doses of propofol (60 mg vs. 248 mg; P <0.001), depth of sedation and time before discharge (1.75 hours vs. 4.45 hours) were significantly lower for patients in the PCS group; nine of them (25.7%) did not use the pump and had total colonoscopy without sedation. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding total duration of colonoscopy (19.4 min (PCS) vs. 18 Two weeks after the procedure, 96.5% of patients in the PCS group were willing to repeat the examination under the same conditions vs. 72.5% of patients in the control group ( P = 0.03). Conclusions-Our results demonstrate that need of sedation is widely overestimated in France. A subset of our patients is willing to consider colonoscopy without general anesthesia. For them, PCS with propofol is an effective and very well accepted form of sedation.
其他文献
我的女儿今年上小学六年级,她以前上网不是很多,我一直也很放心,但可能是受同学影响,她最近迷上了网络小说,而且很入迷,许多时间都花在看那些小说上了。该如何引导? My daug
如何加快发展现代物流服务体系,充分发挥物流业在有色产业振兴中的积极作用,提高有色产业与物流业的协同,以物流服务促进有色产业发展,从而实现两者的良性互动有着极其重要的
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
期刊
由于电子邮件具有快捷、方便、价廉等诸多优点,使用它来作为常用通讯手段的人越来越多了。与此同时,它的负面影响也日益显现,其中最主要的一项,就是所谓“垃圾邮件”。当前
材料成型及控制工程专业是适应中国工业发展而设置的专业,属于是交叉学科,旨在促进工业领域中成型技术的发展。党的十八大召开,对中国人才培养以新的指导思想,即工科专业要着
RAKI是一个充满着时髦料理文化气息的品牌,素来以精湛的日式料理和法餐配合盘饰艺术呈现出精致新派料理的道地美昧,颠覆了客户对传统料理的刻板印象。对此,设计师着力以石材
走进因特网,世界好像就此变小了,不论何时何地,你均可自由访问全世界的网站、索取网上信息。但怎样顺利上网?怎样在浩瀚的信息海洋中找到你想要的信息?又如何来下载信息呢?本
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
过早的定向教育,过度的早期教育,透支了青少年的身体健康、好奇心和想象力。如何帮助孩子成为快乐的人,如何做好家长,当一个好老师,是一门学问。名英国学生问中国学生一天上
首先通过共价键合法制备了羧甲基壳聚糖修饰(CMCS)的Fe3O4-CMCH复合纳米颗粒,然后与谷胱甘肽修饰的CdTe@ZnS QDs通过酰胺缩合反应连接,并在此复合纳米颗粒表面再修饰一层CMCS,最终制备出以CMCS为基质的磁性荧光复合纳米颗粒.利用XRD、TEM、SEM、FT-IR、UV-vis、VSM和荧光光谱等方法对产物性能进行了表征与分析.结果表明:磁性荧光复合微球具有良好的单分散性,平均