论文部分内容阅读
前些年,由于文艺创作生产力的解放,伴随着创作上真正的百花齐放般的繁盛,创作的形式、方法从单一化走向一种有序的多元,几乎把20世纪后期的方法都来试验一番,这就使得文学研究的方法也随着对象的突破而突破。因为方法,正如恩格斯所说,本是对象的“类似物”。就这样,掀起了一股“方法论”的热潮,于是,褒之者认为激活理论思维,使之从惰性和惯性习惯思维中摆脱出来;贬之者则认为是“赶时髦”,把当时输入的一些新术语讥之为“名词轰炸”。更有甚者,似乎革新传统方法,就是背弃传统方法,并由此引申到对马克思主义基本方法的淡化
A few years ago, due to the liberation of literary and artistic creation of productive forces, accompanied by the flourishing creation of a truly flourishing, creative form, method from a single to an orderly diversity, almost the methods of the late twentieth century have to experiment with , Which makes the method of literature research breakthrough with the breakthrough of the object. Because of the method, as Engels said, this is the “analogue” of the object. In this way, an upsurge of “methodological” was set off, so those who praised it as activating the theoretical thinking and getting rid of it from inert and inertial habitual thinking; those who disparaging thought it was “fashionable” and those that were then imported The new term ridiculed as “noun bombing.” What is more, it seems that to reform the traditional method is to abandon the traditional method and extend it to dilute the basic method of Marxism