论文部分内容阅读
近年来,文学作品因涉嫌抄袭引发出的侵权案件越来越多。如果一部作品是受之前已存在的作品的启发或者说是借鉴了原有作品的某些思想和主题内容,而创作出“新”的作品,到底是抄袭还是创新?我国著作权法对改编作品没有明确的规定,因此,在司法实践中,各地法院采取的判定方法也有所不同。本文试从如何认定改编作品和总结国内司法审判经验的基础上,探讨改编权的侵权认定问题。
In recent years, there have been more and more infringement cases caused by the suspected plagiarism of literary works. If a work is inspired by the preexisting work or draws on some of the ideas and thematic contents of the original work, is it possible to create a work that is “new” or plagiarized or innovated? Adaptation of the work there is no clear rules, therefore, in judicial practice, the judgments taken by the courts around the different. This article attempts to explore how to determine the right to infringement on the basis of how to identify the adaptation works and summarize the domestic experience of judicial adjudication.