论文部分内容阅读
对《形而上学》的分析已经很多了,角度的不同,会得到不同的体会。从时代背景去看亚里士多德在意义指称和意义使用,可以得到关于它不一样视角。就意义指称而言,先贤哲学家指称上的不足上,使得本文采用了常识世界中所形成统一日常语言体系下在意义指称上的完善;就意义使用上与理性结合,从而更注重语言使用合理性、完整性和系统性,而不是过分强调意义的色彩,即“意义即使用”;这些都是作为对它分析的切入点。进而可以更深入的理解百科全书似的哲学家对自我语言意义完整性表达的要求。
The analysis of “metaphysics” has been a lot, different perspectives, will get different experience. From the background of the times, Aristotle can use Aristotle to refer to meaning and meaning, and can get a different perspective on it. As far as the allegation of reference is concerned, the shortcomings of the sages philosophers’ allegations make the article use the perfection of meaning allegation under the unified daily language system formed in the common sense world. The combination of meaning and rationality pays more attention to the rational use of language Sex, completeness and systematicness, rather than overemphasizing the meaning of meaning, that is, “meaning that is used”; these are used as a starting point for its analysis. Which can further understand the encyclopedic philosophers’ requirements for the completeness of self-linguistic meanings.