论文部分内容阅读
一问题的提出与研究对象许多年来,在“象征”问题上,由于理论的含混而导致了批评的失效。事实上,理论界、批评界在很长的时间内都把大量精力花费到一些“假问题”上面去了。不论什么原因或动机,总之论题的提出方式在一开始就隐含着“虚假”成分,终于导致论题中的伪成分(即无价值量)占了优势。“口号”、“名词”以及“主义”的斗争代替了冷静客观的逻辑分析和作品研究,他们不是从作品和阅读中得出结论,相反,是用结论
For many years, the issue of a question and the object of study have caused the failure of criticism due to the ambiguity of the theory on the issue of the symbol. In fact, theorists and critics have devoted a great deal of energy to some “false issues” for a long time. Whatever the reason or motivation, the proposition of the topic in the first place implies the “false ” component from the very beginning, finally leading to the advantage of the pseudo-component (ie, the valueless) in the topic. The slogan “”, “nouns ” and “doctrine ” struggle instead of calm and objective logic analysis and works of art research, they do not draw conclusions from works and reading, on the contrary, is the conclusion