论文部分内容阅读
北京春拍刚刚落下,“范郭案(范曾,郭庆祥)”牵出的关于创作过程和艺术批评的立场大讨论就引发了圈内和媒体的热议。事情源于2010年5月,郭在《文汇报》争鸣栏目发表署名文章《艺术家还是要凭作品说话》,文中不点名地批评当前美术界存在的某些浮躁现象。2010年9月,范及其代理人向北京市昌平区人民法院提起诉讼,要求郭赔偿原告精神损失费500万元,要求谢春彦和孙逊各赔偿原告精神损失费20万元。2011年6月13日,郭在京表示,
Beijing Spring Auction has just fallen, and the “Fan Guo case (Fan Zeng and Guo Qingxiang)” pulled out a heated discussion on the process of creation and criticism of the arts in the circle and the media. The incident originated in May 2010 when Guo published a signed article titled “The Artist Still Wants to Speak with Works” in the Commentary Section of the Wen Wei Po. The article criticizes some impetuous phenomena existing in the fine arts world without any name. In September 2010, Fan and his agents filed a lawsuit with Changping District People’s Court in Beijing requesting Guo to compensate the plaintiff for a moral loss of 5 million yuan and for Xie Chunyan and Sun Xun to compensate the plaintiff for a spiritual loss of 200,000 yuan. June 13, 2011, Guo said in Beijing,