论文部分内容阅读
英美法系国家和大陆法系国家的行政诉讼主管机关分别代表了普通法院模式和行政法院模式。两者在设置的理念上体现了分权和制衡的思想,在功能上体现了控权与维权的平衡,在运行中发展了行政判例制度,较好地实现了行政审判的独立性与专业性的协调统一。我国在行政诉讼制度的改革中应借鉴西方的成功经验,强化对行政权的监督和对公民权的救济,满足行政审判的独立性要求,顺应行政审判专业化的趋势,并在司法实践中逐步发展行政判例制度。
Administrative litigation authorities in Anglo-American legal system countries and civil law countries represent the common court model and the administrative court model, respectively. Both of them embody the idea of decentralization and checks and balances in the concept of setting, and reflect the balance of control and rights protection functionally. In the course of operation, they have developed the system of administrative jurisprudence and have better realized the independence and professionalism of administrative trial Harmonization and unification. In the reform of administrative litigation system, our country should learn from the successful experience of the West, strengthen the supervision over administrative power and the relief to civil rights, meet the independence requirements of administrative trial, adapt to the trend of specialization of administrative trial, and gradually develop in judicial practice Administrative case system.