论文部分内容阅读
量刑程序一旦获得独立或相对独立的地位,那么量刑辩护以及辩护律师在量刑程序中的地位和作用将显得尤为重要。量刑辩护有利于限制法官的量刑裁量权、保护被告人权利、提高诉讼效率、提升司法公信力、帮助实现量刑程序的预设功能。从域外经验来看,英美法系国家的量刑辩护主要是围绕量刑前调查报告来展开的。我国量刑程序要想实质化,量刑裁决要想实现公正,法官必须通过量刑程序来获取充足的、真实的量刑信息。基于此,我国量刑辩护制度必须以量刑信息的收集、开示和辩论为切入点,具体包括:律师对量刑证据的调查、量刑证据的开示、量刑答辩与量刑建议、法官在判决书中对量刑辩护的回应。
Once the procedure of sentencing is independent or relatively independent, it will be particularly important that sentencing and defense counsel should play their role and position in sentencing proceedings. The sentencing of sentencing is helpful to limit the discretion of sentencing, protect the rights of defendants, improve the efficiency of litigation, enhance the credibility of the judiciary, and help to realize the preset function of sentencing procedure. Judging from the extraterritorial experience, the sentencing pleadings in common law countries in the United States and Britain mainly focus on the pre-sentencing investigation report. In order to substantively measure the sentencing procedure in our country, if sentencing decisions are to achieve justice, judges must obtain sufficient and true sentencing information through sentencing procedures. Based on this, the sentencing system of sentencing in our country must take the collection, preaching and debating of sentencing information as the starting point, including the investigation of sentencing evidence by lawyers, the disclosure of sentencing evidence, the sentencing of sentencing and the sentencing recommendations, the sentencing of sentencing judges The defense’s response.