论文部分内容阅读
甲:我常常看到有的书法作品写得很拙,乃至于丑,然而它们却出现在展览之中,登载在报刊之上,不知它们是不是真的另有其美学价值?乙:这不可一概而论。有的作品是功夫练到相当高深的程度,于是返璞归真,回归稚拙,犹如武术中所谓的“无招胜有招”。有的则是伪劣之作,没有功夫却以丑拙来包装。甲:这对欣赏经验不丰富的人来说,可就难办了。书法与武术不一样,武术中“无招胜有招”倘是功到极致的表现,那是能在刀剑拳脚上得到证明的,即打败所有的
A: I often see some calligraphic works written very clumsy, and even ugly, but they appear in the exhibition, published in newspapers and magazines, I do not know whether they are really another aesthetic value? B: This is not All in all. Some works are kung fu training to a very high level, so back to nature, return to naive, like martial arts in the so-called Some are fake and inferior, but no effort is ugly to packaging. A: This is difficult to appreciate the experience of people who are not rich. Calligraphy and martial arts are not the same, martial arts “If there is no trick to win the trick ” If it is the ultimate performance, it can be proved on the sword, that is to defeat all