论文部分内容阅读
运用文献资料法、案例分析法等研究方法,对2则具有代表性的高校学生体育运动伤害案件判决书进行法理研析,以期为体育法学理论及应用提供借鉴。研究认为:在“正式竞赛案”中,高校为受益方,应责令校方给予受伤学生经济补偿;在“非正式竞赛案”中,二审法院突兀地大幅降低补偿义务人的损失分担数额,不甚妥当。基于此,进一步分析上述两则案例各自所属的时空范围之自伤情形与存有侵害人的受伤情形以及高校体育课堂内的各类伤害案件,尝试性地提出《高校组织的体育活动中学生伤害案件之妥善处理规则》《高校学生自发组织的体育活动中伤害案件之妥善处理规则》《高校体育课堂内学生伤害案件之妥善处理规则》3份建议稿。
By using the methods of literature review and case study, this article conducts a legal analysis on 2 representative sports injury cases of college students, with a view to providing references for the theory and application of sports jurisprudence. According to the research, in the “formal competition case”, colleges and universities are the beneficiaries, and should be ordered to give financial compensation to the injured students. In the “informal competition case”, the courts of second instance dramatically and unexpectedly reduce the loss share of the compensation obligor Amount, not proper. Based on this, further analysis of the two cases of their respective spatiotemporal extent of the self-injury situation and the presence of perpetrators of injury and the various types of injuries in college sports classrooms, tentatively put forward “college sports activities in student injury cases Proper Handling Rules, ”“ Proper Handling Rules for Injuries in Sports Activities Spontaneously by Students at Colleges and Universities ”and“ Proper Handling Rules for Student Injury Cases in College Physical Education Courses ”.