论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨宫腔镜下输卵管插管疏通术治疗输卵管堵塞的临床效果。方法选取我科62例输卵管堵塞患者,按手术方式不同分为对照组(n=31)和观察组(n=31),对照组采用传统输卵管疏通术,观察组采用宫腔镜下输卵管插管疏通术,比较两组治疗效果。结果观察组输卵管总通畅率为93.55%,显著高于对照组77.42%(P<0.05);术后1年,观察组宫内妊娠率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与传统输卵管疏通术相比,应用宫腔镜下输卵管插管疏通术治疗输卵管堵塞效果更佳,可有效提高输卵管通畅率和宫内妊娠率,值得推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of hysteroscopic tubal catheterization to cure tubal blockage. Methods Sixty-two patients with tubal blockage in our department were divided into control group (n = 31) and observation group (n = 31) according to the operation method. The control group was treated by conventional tubal dredging. The observation group was treated by hysteroscopic tubal intubation Dredge surgery, the two groups were compared. Results The total tubal patency rate in the observation group was 93.55%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (77.42%, P <0.05). The intrauterine pregnancy rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 1 year after operation (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional tubal dredging, hysteroscopic tubal catheterization to clear tubal blockage is better, which can effectively improve tubal patency rate and intrauterine pregnancy rate, which is worth promoting.