论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究PDCA循环用于临床检验质量控制的效果。方法:我院包括门诊、住院以及健康检查等在内的2500份检查样本为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组1250份,观察和比较两组的临床检验质量控制的效果。结果:经过相应的检查,观察组检验样本的不合格率显著少于对照组,且观察组门诊、住院以及健康检查三类标本的检查不合格率均显著低于对照组,两组数据差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:PDCA循环用于临床检验质量控制的效果显著,能够有效的提高检验样本的合格率,使临床检验质量控制更加规范化和有效化,值得在临床上推广和应用。
Objective: To study the effect of PDCA cycle on quality control of clinical tests. Methods: A total of 2500 laboratory samples including outpatient, inpatient and health examination in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 1250 in each group. The clinical quality control effect was observed and compared between the two groups. Results: After the corresponding examination, the failure rate of the test sample in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group, and the unqualified rate of inspection in the outpatient, inpatient and health examination of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group. The data difference between the two groups had Statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: The results of PDCA cycle for quality control of clinical tests are significant, which can effectively improve the passing rate of test samples and make the quality control of clinical tests more standardized and effective. It is worth to be popularized and applied clinically.