论文部分内容阅读
《侵权责任法》颁行后,学界就该法中何为侵权责任的一般条款,争议颇多。在问题类型上,侵权责任一般条款的争议属于立法技术问题,不存在对错之分,仅有优劣之别。侵权责任的一般条款具有价值宣示、行为指引、裁判指引以及资讯集中的立法功能。基于其规范范围的不同,侵权责任一般条款分为有限的侵权责任一般条款与全面的侵权责任一般条款。立法机关本欲将《侵权责任法》第2条打造成全面侵权责任的一般条款,但囿于争议较大和技术缺陷,而沦为转致条款,仅第6条第1款经解释论操作后可作为过错责任认定的一般条款。
After the Tort Liability Act was enacted, there was a lot of controversy over the general clause on what tort liability should be infringed by the academic community. On the type of issue, the dispute over the general clauses of tort liability belongs to the technical issue of legislation. There is no distinction between right and wrong, only the difference between good and bad. The general terms of tort liability have value propositions, behavioral guidelines, guidelines for referees, and legislative functions for information centralization. Based on the different scope of their norms, the general terms of tort liability are divided into general terms of limited tort liability and general tort liability. The legislature would like to make Article 2 of the Tort Liability Act into a general clause of comprehensive tort liability but subject to more controversial and technical flaws and become a turning-over clause only after the interpretation of Article 6, paragraph 1 Can be used as the general terms of fault liability determination.