论文部分内容阅读
近年来,随着非人类中心主义环境伦理思想向法学领域的渗透,有关动植物,大自然等自然物的权利问题逐渐成为法学界关注的一个热点问题,法理学者,民法学者尤其是环境法学者对这一问题仁者见仁,智者见智,争论相当激烈。本文首先阐述了非人类中心主义论述的几个要赋予自然物权利的原因,接着分别对这几个原因进行反驳,坚持不管从操作层面还是理论层面,都不应该赋予自然物权利。我们保护自然物仅仅是为了我们人类自己的利益。
In recent years, with the non-anthropocentric environmental ethics infiltrated into the field of law, the issues concerning the rights and interests of natural things such as animals and plants and nature have gradually become a hot issue in law circles. Law scholars, civil law scholars, especially environmental law scholars The benevolent and the most benevolent thinker on this issue, the debate is quite fierce. This article first elaborates on the reasons for the non-anthropocentrism to give the rights to natural things, and then refutes these reasons respectively, insisting that natural rights should not be granted regardless of the operational level or the theoretical level. We protect the natural objects only for our own own benefit.