论文部分内容阅读
地方官员的治理行为常常徘徊在“可能出问题”的边缘,胆子大的会往出问题的方向多走一两步,而这一两步对于商人来说则含金量十足。商人有什么办法让地方官员多走一两步呢?一种办法是为官员带来显著的发展政绩,另一种办法则是给官员带来足够的私人实惠。前者可以定义为官商合作,后者则可以定义为官商勾结。当前“官商合作”中哪些属于不合规的勾结成份,“官商勾结”中哪些属于合规“合作”成份,在当前政经关系的治理理念和制度中,还没有得到有效说明。那种模糊的官商关系在现实中极容易偏私化地运作,结果把官商关系的正规化部分也拉到偏私的方向,从而加剧了这个领域的腐败程度。
Local officials often governed their governance behavior on the verge of “probable problems,” taking courageous steps one or two steps further, and two steps for merchants. Is there any way for businessmen to take one or two extra steps for local officials? One way is to bring about marked achievements in the development of officials. Another way is to give officials enough private benefits. The former can be defined as cooperation between officials and businessmen, while the latter can be defined as collusion between government and commerce. Currently, what are the non-conforming collusion elements in the “official-business cooperation” and the “collusion between government officials and businessmen” which are part of the compliance “cooperation ” component have not been obtained in the governance philosophy and system of current political and economic relations Effective description. The ambiguous relationship between government and merchants, which is very easy to operate in a partial way in reality, has also led the formalization of the relationship between officials and merchants to favoritism, thereby exacerbating the level of corruption in this field.