论文部分内容阅读
霍维奇在拒斥真之理论语义学的前提下提出倾向性的使用理论,他认为后者的优势在于能够解释意义与使用之间的密切联系。在该理论中,意义被还原为心理学的而非语义学的倾向性接受概念。这种还原导致,它本身无法从语言的实际使用中区分出符合意义规范性的理想使用,以致无法对意义与使用的联系做出令人满意的说明,进而不能完全刻画意义概念。由于诉诸心理学而非语义学的概念,霍维奇的使用理论还隐含着导致意义虚无化的严重危险。这些同时也说明了使用理论未必优越于语义学理论。
In the premise of rejecting theoretical semantics, Howevich put forward the theory of tendentious use, and he believes that the latter has the advantage of being able to explain the close relationship between meaning and use. In this theory, meaning is reduced to the concept of psychology rather than semantic orientation of semantics. This reduction led to itself not being able to distinguish the ideal use of normative ideals from the actual use of language so that the connection between meaning and use can not be satisfactorily described and thus the concept of meaning can not be fully portrayed. Due to the notion of psychology rather than semantics, Howe’s theory of use also implicates the serious danger of nullifying meaning. These also illustrate the use of theory may not be superior to semantic theory.