论文部分内容阅读
生成语法中,英语虚指it结构主要有三种分析策略,分别为将关联体CP作为论元的分析、将关联体CP作为附加语的分析和it移位分析。经验事实表明该结构中关联体CP既非论元,也非附加语,这三种分析策略都没能摆脱这个解释困境。作为一种新的分析策略,箱子结构分析认为虚指it结构中it与CP通过进入合并构成箱子结构,说明了CP的句法地位既非相关谓语直接论元,也非句子附加成分的现象,但同时也引出了自身的问题。
In the generated grammar, there are mainly three kinds of analysis strategies in the English meaning-giving structure of English, which are the analysis of the CP as the argument, the analysis of the CP as the adjunct, and the IT shift analysis. Empirical facts show that the CP in the structure is neither an argument nor an adjunct, and none of the three analytical strategies can get rid of this explanation dilemma. As a new analysis method, the box structure analysis shows that it and CP form box structure through entering and merging, which shows that the syntactic status of CP is neither the direct argument of the relevant predicate nor the phenomenon of additional components in the sentence. At the same time it also leads to its own problems.