论文部分内容阅读
蘇聊教育學術界闗於H.K.岡察洛夫教授『教育學原理』一書底討論,不倲批判了『教育學原理』一書的缺點,同時牵涉了教育科學上許多最重要的問題,這些問题,在這次討論中,不倲提出而且指出了解决問題的原则和方法,從這次討論中的畿個重要文章裏,不倲使我们暸解蘇聊教育科學的新動向;而且使我们知道蘇聊教育學術界是怎樣最(?)地對待科學,怎樣在學衍上開展批評舆自我批評的精神,這對於我们教育學衍界是有最大益處的。我们對於教育科學研究,可以說還倲在開始,目前主要的還是如何擺脱資産階級教育思想的影馨,批判接受教育資産以及總結老解放區十年来的教育經验。我们今天的思想水準,自然還谈不到直接接受這次討論的全部經驗和教訊,但是岡察洛夫的自我批評中所指出的四點錯誤,封我们目前的工作却是一個很好的啓發,並指示了我们一條學習的道路。因此,我们决定把這綫篇文章在本刊發表。以供我國教育學術界的参考和研究。
The discussion in the book of Principles of Pedagogy by Professor Gangcharov, at the end of the book on pedagogy, criticizes the shortcomings of the book Principles of Pedagogy and covers many of the most important issues in education science. These In the course of this discussion, I pointed out and pointed out the principles and methods for resolving the issue. From the important articles in this discussion, I did not understand the new trend of SU’s education science. How education academia treats science most? How to carry out the spirit of criticism and self-criticism? It is of great benefit to us that we should learn and practice education. We can say that at the very beginning of education and scientific research, what we mainly do now is how to get rid of the bourgeois educational thoughts, criticize the acceptance of educational assets and sum up the past ten years of educational experience in the old liberated areas. Our standard of thought today naturally can not be said to directly accept all the experiences and teachings of this discussion, but the four mistakes pointed out in Gangcharov’s self-criticism are a good inspiration to our present work , And instructed us a way to learn. Therefore, we decided to publish this article in this magazine. For our country’s educational academia for reference and research.