论文部分内容阅读
《经济研究》1993年第5期刊登了张军先生的论文《中央计划经济下的产权和制度变迁理论》,其中有一节对我的两篇文章(盛洪,1991,1992b)提出了批评。我很感谢张军先生对我的研究的关注,他的批评为我提供了一次澄清分歧、进一步表述我的观点的机会。一、财富分配相关张军指出,我提出的就计划权利和计划义务进行交易的方案,“在没有财富分配效应的‘科斯世界’里”。其结果“与将权利界定在另一方,也就是界定在计划义务承担者一方时的结果完全等价。因为权利界定在后者意味着以自愿的市场交易取代原来的计划义务。这就是‘买入’型制度变迁的含义。”(1993,第79页)如果对产权的初始界定与产权交易不加区分(其实是有区别的,我将在第五节中讨论这个问题),这句话没有任何逻辑矛盾,但关键在于其中
Economic Studies, No. 5, 1993, published a paper by Mr. Zhang Jun entitled “Theories of Property Rights and Institutional Change under the Central Planned Economy” and one of them criticized my two articles (Shenghong, 1991, 1992b) . I am very grateful to Mr. Zhang Jun for his concern with my research. His criticism provided me with an opportunity to clarify my differences and further elaborate my point of view. I. Related to the Allocation of Wealth Zhang Jun pointed out that the scheme I proposed to deal with the rights of planning and the obligation to make plans was “in the 'Kos world' where there is no wealth allocation effect.” The result "is exactly the same as the result of defining the right on the other side, that is, on the part of the plan obligation holder, since the definition of the right means that the voluntary plan of the market is replaced by a voluntary market transaction. (1993, p. 79) If there is no distinction between the initial definition of property rights and the transaction of property rights (in fact, I will discuss this issue in section 5), the phrase There is no logical contradiction, but the key lies in them