论文部分内容阅读
美国《时代》周刊2012年7月16日最高法院的大法官们就奥巴马医疗保险计划的裁决投出了4:4的结果,首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨的这一票,便成为决定医疗保险计划生死的命门了。然而,最高法院的这一裁决,实际上对于美国的宪政体制产生了重大影响。国会与现政府在政策上发生矛盾,最后诉诸最高法院裁决,本是民主社会应有之义。然而,最高法院的裁决却左右为难:支持任何一方(无论是行政还是立法),都有打破三权分立权力平衡之嫌。面对美国国会内两党之争,社会上的
US TIME Magazine July 16, 2012 The Supreme Court Justice cast a 4: 4 result on the Obama Medical Insurance Plan decision, and the vote of Chief Justice John Roberts became the deciding medical insurance plan Life and death of the door. However, the ruling of the Supreme Court has in fact had a significant impact on the constitutional system of the United States. Conflicts in the policies between the parliament and the present government, and finally resorting to the ruling of the Supreme Court, are supposed to have their own meaning in a democratic society. However, the Supreme Court ruling is dilemma: supporting either side (whether administrative or legislative) has the suspicion of breaking the balance of power in the separation of powers. In the face of the dispute between the two parties in the United States Congress, in society