论文部分内容阅读
原上海市卢湾区人民法院作出的(2009)卢民三(知)初字第135号原告威乐欧洲股份有限公司(WILO SE)诉被告上海威乐水泵有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠纷一案的民事判决书已经发生法律效力。因原上海市卢湾区人民法院撤二建一被撤销,本案由上海市黄浦区人民法院立案执行。经审理查明,原告系“WILO”注册商标的商标专用权人,在商标核定使用的商品范围内原告所享有的商标专用权应受法律保护,被告将“WILE”用于其生产的涉案水泵产品上、外包装盒上、合格证上、说明书上和产品简介上作为其产品标识的行为,属于对“WILE”商标意义的使用。原告是生产水泵类产品的企业,原告的
(2009) Civil Judgment (2009) issued by the People’s Court of Luwan District, Shanghai (2009) WILO SE (Plaintiff No. 135), Plaintiff Vole Europe v. Defendant Shanghai Wilo Pump Co., Ltd. for infringement of trademark exclusive right Has taken legal effect. The case was canceled by the former People’s Court of Luwan District in Shanghai and was put on record by the Shanghai Huangpu District People’s Court. The trial found that the plaintiff “WILO ” registered trademark of the exclusive rights of the trademark, the trademark approved the use of the goods within the scope of the plaintiff’s trademark rights should be protected by law, the defendant will be “WILE ” for its Production involved in the pump products, packaging boxes, certificates, manuals and product descriptions as a product of its identity, is a “WILE ” trademark use. The plaintiff is a manufacturer of water pump products, plaintiff’s