论文部分内容阅读
自畅联万方在由本刊主办的“首届车载信息化高峰论坛”上,发布车联网行业和畅联万方T服务白皮书以来,在一定范围内引起很多争论,争论聚焦点之一就是车联网模式方向。近日,本刊就畅联万方在车联网领域,构建由硬件供应(方案+厂商)、APP应用平台和服务后台融通的商业模型,与佘总进行了深入交流。在互动过程中,笔者发现,不管何种模式,车联网服务商或运营商,都在整合资源的前提下,采取合理分润机制,使车联网从硬件、应用、服务到消费形成一个良性的闭合链条。如同淘宝所打造的三方合作平台一样,淘宝作为资源整合者,扮演的是守门人或看护者的角色,而在车联网领域,致力于提供服务的车联网公司,也有同构性的商业职能。
Since the publication of the White Paper on the Internet of Vehicles Industry and the Continuing Service of the People’s Republic of China on the First Automotive Information Summit Forum sponsored by China Unicom, many parties have been aroused a lot of controversy and argued one of the focal points Is the direction of car networking mode. Recently, we published an in-depth exchange with She Zong on the business model of Lianxiang Wanfang in the field of car networking by providing hardware (solutions + vendors), APP application platforms and service backstations. In the process of interaction, I found that no matter what mode, car network service providers or operators are in the premise of integrating resources to take a reasonable dividend mechanism to make the car network from hardware, applications, services to consumer form a benign Close the chain. Like Taobao’s three-way cooperation platform, Taobao, as a resource integrator, plays the role of gatekeeper or caretaker. In the field of car networking, the car networking company that is committed to providing services also has a homogeneous commercial function.