论文部分内容阅读
众所周知,现代戏、传统戏、新编历史剧三者并举,是剧目创作工作的方针。随着戏剧事业的繁荣与发展,在编演剧目中,不断涌现标有“新编古装戏”、“历史传奇剧”、“新编故事剧”、“古代传奇剧”等颇为繁多的名称。这一现象,引起了戏剧理论界的关注。前不久,有关理论专家建议,关于戏剧创作三并举方针,较为科学的提法,应是提“现代戏、传统戏、新编古代戏三者并举”为好。对此,笔者十分赞赏。关于“历史剧”,顾名思义,应是反映以某个历史阶段主要事件、情节、人物为题材的戏剧艺术。它无法替代笼统地以古代(以古戏服为标志)
As we all know, modern drama, traditional drama, the new historical drama of the three simultaneously, is the repertoire of creative work. With the prosperity and development of the drama industry, quite a few names such as “new costume drama”, “historical legends”, “new historical dramas” and “ancient legends” have been constantly appearing in the repertoire. This phenomenon has aroused the concern of theatrical theorists. Not long ago, relevant theoretical experts suggested that the more scientific formulation of the principle of “three acts for theater creation” should be mentioned as “modern drama, traditional drama and new ancient drama simultaneously”. In this regard, I very much appreciated. As for “historical drama”, as its name implies, it should be a drama art that reflects the main events, plots and figures of a certain historical stage. It can not replace the ancient (ancient costumes as a symbol)