论文部分内容阅读
有关调查数据表明,截至今年2月,中国遭受的外国反倾销已经超过600起,为全球之最。而更加触目惊心的是,我国参与应诉的胜诉率却只有35.5%。以中国彩电业应诉美反倾销一案为例,前不久,美国商务部颁布反倾销令,对中国进入其市场的21英寸以上的显像管彩电征收反倾销税。具体幅度为:应诉企业中厦华5.22%,康佳9.69%,TC L21.25%,长虹26.37%,海尔等9家企业22.94%,而没有应诉的企业税率则高达78.45%。在这次彩电业反倾销一案中,与同行相比,厦华获得了最低终裁,原因何在?厦华董事长郭则理提炼出一句话,这就是“应对反倾销是门必修课”。他解释说,
Relevant survey data show that as of February this year, China has suffered more than 600 foreign anti-dumping measures, making it the highest in the world. And even more shocking is that China's participation rate of only 35.5% of the respondents. Take the case of China's color TV industry responding to anti-dumping cases as an example. Not long ago, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued an anti-dumping duty to impose anti-dumping duties on color TV sets of more than 21 inches that China entered into its market. Specifically, the respondent companies included 5.22% of Xoceco, 9.69% of Konka, 21.25% of TC, 26.37% of Changhong and 22.94% of 9 enterprises such as Haier, while the corporate tax rate of no response was as high as 78.45%. In this case of anti-dumping in the color TV industry, compared with their peers, Xiamen Overseas Chinese won the minimum final ruling, the reason? Xoceco Guo Zeli, chairman refined a sentence, which is “anti-dumping is a compulsory course ”. He explained that,