论文部分内容阅读
主持人语:本栏目三篇文章均讨论《老子》而主旨各有不同。李若晖《虚妄的“道体”:思想变迁下的经典诠释》一文,主要讨论《老子》第四章“道冲而用之或不盈”句,指出在《老子》的诠释史实际存在两种不同的句读和理解,一种是读为:道,冲而用之或(又)不盈。以河上公、王弼为代表,实际是讲对道的运用(道用),道需虚而用之,又不盈满,方能自然从容。如一个人能举重百斤,则举百斤之物只能勉强不落,若举十斤之物则能运用自如,故知道者当以虚为用。另一种是读为:道冲,而用之或不盈。始于苏辙的《老子解》,后逐渐流行。道冲是说道以冲虚为体,实
Moderator Language: The three articles in this section discuss “Lao Tzu” with different themes. Li Ruohui’s “Falsehood”: “Classic Interpretation under the Change of Thought”, mainly discusses the fourth chapter of “Laozi” and the sentence “Tao Chong and its use or not”, pointing out that in the annotation history of Lao Zi There are actually two different kinds of sentence reading and understanding, one is reading: Road, red and the use of (or) not profitable. To the river Gong, Wang Bi as the representative, is actually speaking on the use of Taoism (Taoism), the Tao needs to be virtual use, but not full, in order to naturally calm. If a person can lift a hundred pounds, then lifting the weight of a thing can only barely fall, if you give ten pounds of things you can use freely, so that when you know the virtual use. The other is read: Road red, and use it or not. Beginning in the Soviet era, “I repay”, after the popular. Road red is said to Chong virtual body, real