论文部分内容阅读
随着《联合国反腐败公约》在我国的正式生效,刑事缺席审判制度日益成为我国理论界关注的对象。长期以来,我国在刑事诉讼中都采取的是对席审判。但司法实践的结果表明,绝对禁止缺席审判既阻碍了对被害人利益的保护与诉讼效率的提高,又影响了维护司法权威和社会的稳定;且在我国三大诉讼中,唯独刑事诉讼法没有确立刑事缺席审判制度。为适应当前与国际社会协作同犯罪作斗争的需要,进一步完善刑事诉讼立法,有必要构建我国的刑事缺席审判制度。
With the formal entry into force of the UN Convention against Corruption in our country, the criminal default trial system has increasingly become the object of attention of our theoretical circles. For a long time, all our criminal proceedings have taken is the trial of seats. However, the results of judicial practice show that absolutely forbidding trial in absentia hinders not only the protection of victims’ interests and the efficiency of litigation, but also the maintenance of judicial authority and social stability; and in the three major litigations of our country, only the Criminal Procedure Law Establishing a system of criminal default trial. In order to meet the current need of the international community in the fight against crime and further improve the legislation of criminal procedure, it is necessary to construct the system of trial of criminal default in our country.