论文部分内容阅读
章太炎自1920年代以來發表大量批判“古史辨”襲取日本人疑古餘緒之言論,但其連番譏諷一直未引起注意或討論。本文即以此爲起點和觀察視角,重新探究“古史辨”的日本因素,並在上世紀初中日文化交流頻繁的時代背景下探討胡適、顧頡剛接觸日本相關學術的可能性,觀察他們在時代變局下的治學心態。最後,本文將比較“古史辨”與“東洋學”興起的原因與目的,以及它們與二十年代中國社會、政治環境等錯綜複雜的關係。當然,藉着相關探討,我們能同時看到世變之下史家在建立學術事業過程中顯露的人生宗旨、學養情操,以及與之息息相關的歷史意識與民族文化認同。
Zhang Taiyan has published a large number of criticisms since the 1920s, “ancient history identified” attack Japanese suspicions, but its repeated ridicule has not attracted any attention or discussion. In this paper, I use this as a starting point and observation point of view to re-explore the “ancient history identified ” Japanese factors, and in the early last century the background of frequent cultural exchanges between China and Japan to explore Hu Shi, Gu Jie Gang exposure to Japanese-related academic possibilities, observe them In the changing age of the state of mind. In the end, this article will compare the reasons and purposes of the rise of “ancient history” and “the study of Orientalism” and their intricate relationship with China’s social and political environment in the 1920s. Of course, through the relevant discussions, we can simultaneously see the purpose, sentiment and the historical awareness and national cultural identity of the historians revealed in the process of establishing academic undertakings under the changing conditions.