论文部分内容阅读
2001年底,媒体曾报道,有人针对23个大中城市抽检了10类蔬菜的181个样品,结果农药残留超过国家标准限量值的占47.5％,主要问题是有机磷残留量超标。由于媒体的渲染(有些甚至使用“霉菜”字样),这一信息在消费者中造成了一定的恐慌。 对于不了解详情和真实情况的人来说,恐慌是可以理解的。但是,在这里,我们想告诉广大消费者的是,应该理智、科学、客观地看待食品中的农药残留问题,因为农药残留的监控是一个技术性很强的工作,它涉及到评判的标准、抽样布点与样本大小、农药品种和蔬菜品种,以及分析质量控制等多个方面。
At the end of 2001, the media once reported that 181 samples of 10 types of vegetables were sampled from 23 large and medium-sized cities. As a result, pesticide residues exceeded the national standard by 47.5%. The main problem was the excessive amount of organophosphorus residues. This information caused some panic among consumers due to media rendering (some even using the word “mustard”). Panic is understandable to those who do not know the details and the real situation. However, here we want to tell the consumers that the problem of pesticide residues in food should be treated rationally, scientifically and objectively. Because the monitoring of pesticide residues is a highly technical work involving the criteria for judging, sampling Distribution and sample size, pesticide varieties and vegetable varieties, as well as analysis of quality control and other aspects.