论文部分内容阅读
罗马法所形成的“谁主张,谁举证”原则一直延续到现代社会的诉讼活动中,为世界各国的诉讼法所采用,但是在有些案件中考虑到某种特殊的情形,法律规定免除了原告的首先提出证据的责任,而由被告承担与此事实主张相反的事实主张的举证责任。后这一特殊规则被引入刑事诉讼,从而突破无罪推定原则下的举证责任分配,更加有力保护被告人的人权,促进了世界各国的诉讼法学的发展。在当前我国司法改革之时,有必要探讨被告方所承当的举证责任,以促进立法的完善,适应时代潮流。
The Roman law formed by the “who advocate, who evidence” principle has been extended to the litigation activities in modern society, for the law of the countries in the world to adopt, but in some cases to take into account a special case, the law exemptions The plaintiff’s first respondent’s burden of proof was the defendant’s burden of proof on the contrary to the factual claim. This special rule was introduced into criminal procedure, so as to break the distribution of burden of proof under the principle of presumption of innocence and protect the human rights of defendants more effectively, so as to promote the development of procedural law in all countries of the world. At the time of the current judicial reform in our country, it is necessary to discuss the burden of proof that the defendant undertakes to improve the legislation and adapt to the trend of the times.