论文部分内容阅读
清代学者吴世尚在《楚辞疏》中对《离骚》串讲时,明确指出了“白日梦”的创作心理现象和状态,这一指出早于弗洛依德180多年。两个“白日梦”理论有同有异,这相异之处恰恰是弗洛依德的理论不准确、不完备或有缺陷的地方,足证吴世尚对“白日梦”的研究成就不在弗洛依德之下。在“白日梦”的普通性、论证对象、表述方式等方面,吴世尚还要比弗洛依德高明。因此,要正确地、全面地解释“白日梦”现象,形成科学的、符合创作实际的有关理论,必须将二者结合起来,互证互补。而这正是今人要作的工作。
Wu Shichang, a scholar in the Qing Dynasty, clearly pointed out the creative psychological phenomenon and state of “Daydreaming ” in the series of “Li Sao” in Chu Ci Shu. This is pointed out earlier than Freud for more than 180 years. Two “daydream ” theory are the same, the difference is precisely the Freudian theory inaccurate, incomplete or defective place, enough Wu Shi Shang The research achievements are not under Freud. In “daydream ” the commonality, the object of argument, the way of expression, etc., Wu Shishang even better than Freud. Therefore, to correctly and comprehensively explain the “daydreaming” phenomenon and form a scientific and relevant theory that meets the actual conditions of creation, we must combine the two with each other and complement each other. And this is exactly what people are going to do.