论文部分内容阅读
近年来,收入分配不公的问题已成为全国上下十分关注的问题。江泽民同志在庆祝建国40周年大会上的讲话中把如何防止和纠正社会分配不公作为一个重要问题提出来。下面我就这个问题谈一些看法和体会。一、两种现象的并存和反差是分配不公的突出表现什么叫收入分配不公?这里有一个衡量公与不公的标准问题。只要我们坚持按劳分配作为社会主义制度下个人收入分配的基本原则或标准,那么,不符合这一原则的两种现象——平均主义和收入悬殊,都是分配不公的表现。如果只把收入悬殊视为分配不公,就容易自觉或不自觉地以平均主义而不是以按劳分配作为衡量公与不公的标准,从而对我国当前收入分配不公的问题作出不全面的判断。我认为,比较全面的和切合实际的判断应该是:一方面个人收入分配中的平均主义的痼疾尚未治愈,但另一方面又出现了少数人和少数经济活动收入偏高的问题。正如江泽民同志所说的,“一方面在企业事业单位和党政机关中靠工资收入的职工之间,平均主义现象尚未完全克服,在有些地方、部门和领域中甚至还有所滋长;另一方面又出现了收入过分悬殊的新的社会分配不公。”这就是说,平均主义是原来就已存在的社会分配不公,收入过分悬殊则是新出现的社会分配不公。目前社会上反响比较强烈的是
In recent years, the issue of unfair income distribution has become a national issue of great concern. In his speech at the General Assembly Celebration of the 40th Anniversary of the Founding of New China, Comrade Jiang Zemin put forward how to prevent and correct the social inequity in distribution as an important issue. Here I talk about some of this issue and experience. First, the coexistence of two phenomena and contrast is the outstanding performance of unfair distribution What is the distribution of unfair income? There is a measure of public and injustice standards. As long as we adhere to the distribution according to work as the basic principle or standard for the distribution of personal income under the socialist system, the two phenomena that do not meet this principle-egalitarianism and income disparity-are manifestations of inequitable distribution. If only the income disparity is regarded as unfair distribution, it is easy to conscientiously or unconsciously use egalitarianism instead of distribution according to work as a measure of public and injustice, so as to make an incomplete judgment on the current unfair distribution of income in our country. In my opinion, the more comprehensive and realistic judgments should be: On the one hand, the egalitarianism in the distribution of personal income has not yet been cured, but on the other hand, the problem of high incomes of the minority and minority economic activities has emerged. As Comrade Jiang Zemin put it, “the egalitarian phenomenon has not yet been completely overcome between the workers and staff members in enterprises and institutions and party and government organs that rely on wage income. In some places, sectors and fields even have their own growth. The other There is also a new social inequality with excessively disproportionate incomes. ”This means that egalitarianism is an existing unfair distribution of society and disproportionate incomes are unfair distribution of newly emerging societies. At present, there is a strong response in society