论文部分内容阅读
国际海洋争端的根源在于对国家利益的追求,因而海洋争端的解决也应围绕国家利益展开。本文从国家利益这一核心要素入手,将国际海洋争端划分为完全主权利益海洋争端、有限主权利益海洋争端和共同利益海洋争端三种类型。以此分析框架的建构为基础,本文进而分析了美国海洋争端解决机制的类型及基本思路,并以美国和加拿大缅因湾区域海洋边界划界争端为例,进行三种类型海洋争端解决机制的实证分析。对中国而言,美国这一海洋发展大国和海权大国在海洋争端解决机制方面的经验,可为有效解决目前我国所面临的海洋争端提供思路和策略。
The root of international maritime disputes lies in the pursuit of national interests, so the settlement of maritime disputes should also focus on national interests. This article starts with the core element of national interest and divides the international maritime disputes into three types: maritime disputes of complete sovereignty interests, maritime disputes of limited sovereignty interests and common interests maritime disputes. Based on this framework, this paper analyzes the types and basic ideas of the US maritime dispute settlement mechanism. Taking the maritime boundary delimitation dispute in the United States and Canada as an example, this paper discusses three types of maritime dispute settlement mechanisms Empirical analysis. For China, the experience of the United States as a maritime power and maritime power in the maritime dispute settlement mechanism can provide ideas and strategies for effectively resolving the maritime disputes that China faces now.