论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨急诊护理路径与传统护理对急性心肌梗死抢救效果及康复效果的影响。方法对2015年1月—2017年1月在该院诊断为急性心肌梗死的86例患者进行研究,按照入院顺序分为两组,对照组进行传统护理,观察组进行急诊护理路径,对其护理满意度以及康复效果进行评价。结果观察组患者护理满意度显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的抢救时间和住院时间显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性心肌梗死患者采用急诊护理路径后可以提高患者的护理满意度,促进患者身体康复,值得在临床护理中应用。
Objective To explore the effects of emergency nursing and traditional nursing care on the rescue and recovery of acute myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 86 patients diagnosed as AMI from January 2015 to January 2017 in our hospital were divided into two groups according to admission sequence. The control group received traditional nursing and the observation group received emergency nursing. Satisfaction and rehabilitation effectiveness evaluation. Results The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The rescue time and hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly better than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions The emergency nursing pathway in acute myocardial infarction patients can improve patient satisfaction and promote physical rehabilitation, which is worth to be used in clinical nursing.