论文部分内容阅读
目的牙齿修复中即刻种植法与常规种植法的应用效果。方法将我院2015年5月至2016年7月接诊的84例牙齿缺失需行牙齿修复患者按采取的牙齿种植方法不同分为即刻种植的观察组与常规种植的对照组,将两组的1、3、6个月的ISQ值与牙齿松动率、牙周组织红肿率、牙周组织溢脓率作以比较。结果不同时间点ISQ值组内差异与间差异均无显著性,差异不具备统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者种植后出现牙齿松动、牙周组织红、牙周组织溢脓的发生率分别为7.1%、9.5%、2.4%;对照组患者种植后出现牙齿松动、牙周组织红、牙周组织溢脓的发生率分别为4.8%、7.1%、2.4%,两组上述症状发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论即刻种植法与常规种植法在牙齿修复中的应用效果相差无几,但需充分掌握即刻种植法的适应证与操作要点。
Objective The effect of immediate planting and conventional planting in tooth restoration. Methods Eighty-four cases of dental defects requiring dental restoration from May 2015 to July 2016 in our hospital were divided into two groups according to the method of dental implant: immediately-implanted observation group and conventional implanted control group. ISQ values at 1, 3 and 6 months were compared with those of tooth loosening, periodontal redness and periodontal overflow. Results There was no significant difference between the ISQ value groups at different time points, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The incidence of tooth looseness, periodontal tissue redness and periodontal pyorrhea in observation group were 7.1%, 9.5% and 2.4%, respectively. The control group had loose teeth, red periodontal tissue, periodontal tissue The incidence of empyema were 4.8%, 7.1% and 2.4% respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of these symptoms between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion The effect of immediate planting method and conventional planting method in dental restoration is almost the same. However, it is necessary to fully understand the indications and operational points of immediate planting method.