论文部分内容阅读
目的对整肤与体表神经电刺激两种治疗成人大骨节病患者的方法及效果进行对比研究。方法选取成人大骨节病患者52例,采用国际通用的视觉疼痛判定法进行疼痛分级,然后随机分为整肤治疗组与体表神经电刺激治疗组,分别给予整肤疗法和体表神经电刺激疗法对两组成人大骨节病患者进行治疗,通过疗效判断标准确定患者的治疗效果并进行对比分析研究。结果整肤治疗组治疗效果优良率84.6%,总有效率100.0%;体表神经电刺激治疗组治疗效果优良率61.5%,总有效率100.0%。两组优良率比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论两种治疗方法对成人大骨节病患者均有显著疗效,整肤疗法的疗效更佳。
Objective To compare the efficacy of the two methods of treatment of adult Kashin-Beck disease with skin and nerve stimulation. Methods Fifty-two patients with adult Kashin-Beck disease were selected and pain graded by the internationally accepted method of visual acuity determination. The patients were then randomly divided into skin-treatment group and body-surface nerve stimulation group, and were given whole-skin therapy and nerve stimulation Treatment of adult patients with Kashin-Beck disease treatment, determine the efficacy of the treatment by the efficacy of the patient’s treatment and comparative analysis. Results The whole skin treatment group was 84.6% and the total effective rate was 100.0%. The excellent and good rate of surface nerve stimulation group was 61.5% and the total effective rate was 100.0%. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion Both treatments have significant curative effect on adult patients with Kashin-Beck disease, and the effect of whole skin therapy is better.