论文部分内容阅读
矿产资源归国家所有是我国法律的一贯规定。对于这一规定,学界多从民法学上来理解,将之解释为民法上的国家所有权。这一理解存在缺陷,导致国家资源管理部门兼具运动员与裁判员的矛盾角色。为了克服这一理解上的不足,可以考虑将之理解为宪法学上的权力安排。即矿产资源国家所有不是对民事权力的划分,而是对资源控制权的分配。由此也就解决了矿产资源开采审批权的性质,恢复了国家资源管理部门维护社会公共利益的角色和职能。
Mineral resources owned by the state are the consistent stipulations of our country’s law. For this provision, many scholars from the civil law to understand, to explain the civil law of state ownership. This understanding is flawed, leading to the contradictory role of national resource administrations as both athletes and referees. In order to overcome this lack of understanding, we can consider it as a constitutional power arrangement. That is, all the mineral resources countries are not the division of civil power, but the distribution of control over resources. Therefore, the nature of examination and approval right of mineral resources mining has also been solved and the roles and functions of national resource management departments in maintaining social public interest have been restored.