后现代思潮与史学研究的反思

• 出 处: 文史知识
• 发表日期: 2008年06期
• 关键词: 后现代思潮 史学史研究 江湄 世瑜 《学术研究》 现代哲学 史学理论 西方启蒙 自身理论 学术学科

《学术研究》2008年第3期组织江湄、向燕南、徐兆仁、赵世瑜等学者撰文,就后现代思潮与史学史研究展开专题讨论。学者们认为:后现代的理论太尖锐了,尽管没有传统意义的哲学那么谨严细密的思辨、严整完备的体系,但其锋芒所向,却忽喇喇地直刺西方启蒙运动以来一直所向披靡、不可一世的科学理性的软肋,只逼得那些标榜着科学理性的现代哲学一激灵,不得不急急地回过招来招架、回应、辩护,乃至缝补自身理论的缺陷,而学术则经这一番理论的反思,获得新得升华。

“Academic Research” 2008 the third period organization Jiang Mei, Xiang Yanan, Xu Zhaoren, Zhao Shiyu and other scholars author, on post-modernism and history of the history of thematic discussion. Scholars think: the theory of postmodernism is too sharp. Although there is no cautious, precise and complete system without the traditional philosophies, its theory has always been invincible and has been invincible since the Western Enlightenment. The soft underbelly of the scientific rationality of the first era only forced those who had mastered the scientific philosophy of a modern one, who had to hurry to recruit, respond to, defend and even remedy their own theoretical shortcomings, while academic theory Reflections, get new sublimation.